Project Re-Rail: Marie Kon-don't-you-touch-my-shit

I'll be really honest. I only picked up The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up because I first read The Life-Changing Magic of Not Giving a Fuck and Sarah Knight believes in this KonMarie thing. I'll be extra super duper honest and add that I've only read the first 50 pages or so so far. But based on those 50 pages, I have a few guesses about Marie Kondo:

  1. She's probably neurotypical, or if she's on the autism spectrum, she's on the part that means you can reliably predict your interests for the next fifteen or fifty years.
  2. She doesn't have many hobbies.
  3. She's not much of a reader.
Why do I think this? Because based on these 50 pages, I've been told that over the course of six months, I should go through every one of my belongings and discard any that does not spark joy. I've further been told that there is a strict order this should follow, and "books" comes before "papers" comes before "miscellany" in this order.

Here are my problems with this.

First, if you're going to tell me to go through my belongings in six months and discard any that don't spark joy right now, you'd better be willing to pay for the replacement costs of everything I change my mind about in a year. I'm on the part of the autism spectrum that means I hyperfixate on things, but those things rotate at unpredictable rates. When I was sixteen, I happily spent over an hour explaining vampires to the nice lady running the OASIS test. Now, I couldn't give a fuck about them, but would you like me to explain to you the cosmology of Kingdom Hearts?

(Say no. It's a trap.)

I drive my boyfriend crazy talking about League of Legends, but for two months after Mortal Kombat 11 came out I battered him with the towers I'd beaten with Scorpion and how no one played Baraka professionally except one person but did I mention that person beat one of the top players in the world with him?? Child-me loved Harry Potter. Adult-me would like to explain to you how great a writer Seanan McGuire is. My checkout list at the library two years ago was almost maxed on urban fantasy; now I have 84 books out including self-help, financial education, Shintoism, New York City, and the persecution of Japanese-Americans in World War II. I've abandoned my fiction writing entirely, only to pick it up the next year and go back to swimming in it. I'll spend a month doing nothing but Sudoku, then switch to drawing when my brain starts to leak out my ears.

Do you see my problem with the "spark joy" criteria?

I know this about me. I can usually predict the likelihood of me circling back around to something, or at least doing so before the things I use to fuel that stop being of use (yeast that will go bad before I make bread again; paints that will dry before I ever use them). But even I make mistakes. I've had to rescue clothes from the charity bin when I realized that "I don't wear graphic tees anymore" me didn't account for the future "shirts should be loose and soft and can have whatever they want on them if they are" me, a me who could literally only be comfortable in my skin if my clothes barely touched it. I've spent half an hour looking for a pair of boots that I finally realized I'd given away months ago. I've given a friend of a friend hundreds of dollars of craft supplies and then (just a couple days ago, in fact) realized I should have kept some of those.

The "spark joy" idea is great to an extent. Really! I'm not saying the criteria as a whole is broken or useless. The criteria puts the burden on saying that you want to keep something instead of saying you want to discard something. Discarding becomes the default, not the punishment for things you don't use. My problem with the criteria is that it assumes that everyone holds onto things for the same reason.

And my second problem is: books? Then papers? Then miscellany? I'm assuming that my board game collection, art supplies, and video game system would be under "miscellany," but in what order? How do you break up "miscellany" the way you need to if you have stuff-heavy hobbies? And in what universe are papers harder to go through and get rid of than books???

Now, again, I've only read about 50 pages of this. And I'm still planning to finish it. Maybe I'll change my mind in the future, and either way I'll be posting about what I think of the book as a whole. But my reaction so far has been a lot of frowning and a lot of yelling from my self-preservation instinct.

Seriously. I could've saved myself like $400 if I'd just kept those jewelry-making supplies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Flea and the Acrobat: The origin of this segment

What Does The "Undo" Button Do?: The Origin Of This Segment

What does the "Undo" button do: I'm not a therapist, but I play one on the phone.